英國政府敗訴
分享一則資訊。
Gloating Europhiles hailed Theresa May's humiliation after judges ruled she cannot trigger Brexit without approval from parliament.
英國啟動退歐程序一案，特蕾莎·梅政府敗訴。英國最高大院裁決稱，未經議會表決同意，首相不能單方面啟動《里斯本條約》第50條。這對留歐派來說無疑是一個好消息。
The U.K. High Court ruled that lawmakers should vote on whether the government can begin the formal Brexit process by triggering Article 50 of the EU treaty.
英國最高法院裁決稱，立法者應該就政府能否觸發歐盟《里斯本條約》第50條啟動脫歐進程進行投票。
The case was brought by British citizens Gina Miller, a business woman, pictured outside the High Court after the landmark ruling.
此案是由英國女商人米勒帶頭發起，圖為在這個具有里程碑式的裁定后，她站在英國最高法院門口。
The ruling is a defeat for the government. Prime Minister Theresa May wanted to trigger Article 50 by the end of March 2024, meaning the U.K. would most likely leave the EU two years later.
裁決顯示政府輸了。首相特蕾莎·梅本想在2024年3月底啟動《里斯本條約》第50條，也就是說，英國很可能在兩年后離開歐盟（也就是2024年）。
It sparked furious accusations that a High Court case that could delay Brexit is an “attempt to frustrate the will of the British people.”
這一裁決引起社會強烈指責，最高法院延遲英國退歐流程是“阻礙選舉人意愿的決定”。
The government said it was disappointed by the judgment and would appeal.
政府表示，對裁決結果感到失望，將會上訴。
"I worry that a betrayal may be near at hand," Farage said after the High Court ruling was announced on Thursday morning.
3日早上高等法院的裁決下來后，法拉奇說：“我很擔心馬上會有一場背叛上演。”
Parliament is unlikely to block Brexit outright. But the ruling could mean Brexit is delayed, particularly by opposition in the upper chamber -- the House of Lords.
議會不太可能直接阻止脫歐。但這個判決可能意味著脫歐進程會拖延，尤其會因為上議院成員的反對而拖延。
The main opposition Labour Party has already said it won't try to block Brexit and instead will use the ruling to push for a Brexit "that works for Britain, putting jobs, living standards and the economy first."
反對黨工黨已經說了不會阻止脫歐，相反地，會利用這次裁決來推行一個“優先考慮就業、生活水平和經濟的，更加適合英國的”脫歐過程。
The government will appeal the judgment. The Supreme Court is likely to hear the case in early December and issue a ruling by early January.
特蕾莎·梅政府將上訴。最高法院很可能在今年12月初審理本案，并在明年1月初作出判決。
更多精彩內容，請繼續關注本網站。
分享一則資訊。
Gloating Europhiles hailed Theresa May's humiliation after judges ruled she cannot trigger Brexit without approval from parliament.
英國啟動退歐程序一案，特蕾莎·梅政府敗訴。英國最高大院裁決稱，未經議會表決同意，首相不能單方面啟動《里斯本條約》第50條。這對留歐派來說無疑是一個好消息。
The U.K. High Court ruled that lawmakers should vote on whether the government can begin the formal Brexit process by triggering Article 50 of the EU treaty.
英國最高法院裁決稱，立法者應該就政府能否觸發歐盟《里斯本條約》第50條啟動脫歐進程進行投票。
The case was brought by British citizens Gina Miller, a business woman, pictured outside the High Court after the landmark ruling.
此案是由英國女商人米勒帶頭發起，圖為在這個具有里程碑式的裁定后，她站在英國最高法院門口。
The ruling is a defeat for the government. Prime Minister Theresa May wanted to trigger Article 50 by the end of March 2024, meaning the U.K. would most likely leave the EU two years later.
裁決顯示政府輸了。首相特蕾莎·梅本想在2024年3月底啟動《里斯本條約》第50條，也就是說，英國很可能在兩年后離開歐盟（也就是2024年）。
It sparked furious accusations that a High Court case that could delay Brexit is an “attempt to frustrate the will of the British people.”
這一裁決引起社會強烈指責，最高法院延遲英國退歐流程是“阻礙選舉人意愿的決定”。
The government said it was disappointed by the judgment and would appeal.
政府表示，對裁決結果感到失望，將會上訴。
"I worry that a betrayal may be near at hand," Farage said after the High Court ruling was announced on Thursday morning.
3日早上高等法院的裁決下來后，法拉奇說：“我很擔心馬上會有一場背叛上演。”
Parliament is unlikely to block Brexit outright. But the ruling could mean Brexit is delayed, particularly by opposition in the upper chamber -- the House of Lords.
議會不太可能直接阻止脫歐。但這個判決可能意味著脫歐進程會拖延，尤其會因為上議院成員的反對而拖延。
The main opposition Labour Party has already said it won't try to block Brexit and instead will use the ruling to push for a Brexit "that works for Britain, putting jobs, living standards and the economy first."
反對黨工黨已經說了不會阻止脫歐，相反地，會利用這次裁決來推行一個“優先考慮就業、生活水平和經濟的，更加適合英國的”脫歐過程。
The government will appeal the judgment. The Supreme Court is likely to hear the case in early December and issue a ruling by early January.
特蕾莎·梅政府將上訴。最高法院很可能在今年12月初審理本案，并在明年1月初作出判決。
更多精彩內容，請繼續關注本網站。
