gre argument233提綱分析匯總
前段時間為gre考生匯總了gre issue寫作提綱思路和分析，希望對考生在攻破gre issue寫作上有所幫助。接下來的幾天我們將為gre考生整理gre argument部分的提綱內(nèi)容。希望通過我們的整理和匯總，讓gre考生真正能掌握gre寫作的精髓。
題目題材：工程建設(shè)
gre argument 233題目：
The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of a company that builds shopping malls throughout the country.
The surface of a section of Route 101, paved two years ago by McAdam Road Builders, is now badly cracked and marred by dangerous potholes. In another part of the state, a section of Route 66, paved by Appian Roadways more than four years ago, is still in good condition. Appian Roadways has recently purchased state-of-the-art paving machinery, and it has hired a new quality-control manager. Because of its superior work and commitment to quality, we should contract with Appian Roadways rather than McAdam Road Builders to construct the access roads for all our new shopping malls.
提綱：
Only one of all roads built by each company is compared, and only one section of each road is compared, thus we cannot evaluate the overall quality of construction of the two companies.
Many other factors that would influence the condition of a road are ignored by the president.
The arguer does not provide any information about the machinery used and the status of quality-control personnel at McAdam.
No information about the performance of the new quality-control manager at Appian is provided.
Many factors besides equipment and on-site management would also affect the quality of a pavement job.
Granted that the quality of routes paved by Appian is superior, we cannot guarantee Appian could also do an excellent job in constructing the access roads for shopping malls.
The president hastily assumes that Appian is capable of constructing the access roads of all new shopping malls.
The president fails to consider if Appian are willing to contract with the company to construct access roads.
Other competent companies might be available for the president to choose from.
注：題目中括號里的數(shù)字表明這句話體現(xiàn)的是提綱中第幾號缺陷。
無論是gre issue還是gre argument，考生都應(yīng)該養(yǎng)成寫提綱的習慣。這種提綱式的gre寫作練習可以幫助考生鍛煉寫作的邏輯性，而gre寫作高分最重要的得分依據(jù)就是作文的邏輯性要強。
前段時間為gre考生匯總了gre issue寫作提綱思路和分析，希望對考生在攻破gre issue寫作上有所幫助。接下來的幾天我們將為gre考生整理gre argument部分的提綱內(nèi)容。希望通過我們的整理和匯總，讓gre考生真正能掌握gre寫作的精髓。
題目題材：工程建設(shè)
gre argument 233題目：
The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of a company that builds shopping malls throughout the country.
The surface of a section of Route 101, paved two years ago by McAdam Road Builders, is now badly cracked and marred by dangerous potholes. In another part of the state, a section of Route 66, paved by Appian Roadways more than four years ago, is still in good condition. Appian Roadways has recently purchased state-of-the-art paving machinery, and it has hired a new quality-control manager. Because of its superior work and commitment to quality, we should contract with Appian Roadways rather than McAdam Road Builders to construct the access roads for all our new shopping malls.
提綱：
Only one of all roads built by each company is compared, and only one section of each road is compared, thus we cannot evaluate the overall quality of construction of the two companies.
Many other factors that would influence the condition of a road are ignored by the president.
The arguer does not provide any information about the machinery used and the status of quality-control personnel at McAdam.
No information about the performance of the new quality-control manager at Appian is provided.
Many factors besides equipment and on-site management would also affect the quality of a pavement job.
Granted that the quality of routes paved by Appian is superior, we cannot guarantee Appian could also do an excellent job in constructing the access roads for shopping malls.
The president hastily assumes that Appian is capable of constructing the access roads of all new shopping malls.
The president fails to consider if Appian are willing to contract with the company to construct access roads.
Other competent companies might be available for the president to choose from.
注：題目中括號里的數(shù)字表明這句話體現(xiàn)的是提綱中第幾號缺陷。
無論是gre issue還是gre argument，考生都應(yīng)該養(yǎng)成寫提綱的習慣。這種提綱式的gre寫作練習可以幫助考生鍛煉寫作的邏輯性，而gre寫作高分最重要的得分依據(jù)就是作文的邏輯性要強。
