GRE寫作:Argument正文部分如何套用模板
GRE寫作如何套用模版?個(gè)人的觀點(diǎn)argument就是要用模板的~~那些承上啟下的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)表達(dá)大家都用~~不止中國人啊~~而且argument一般只看你邏輯~對(duì)于語言要求也沒那么高,整理Argument正文部分模板,希望對(duì)你的GRE備考有所借鑒
正文部分
The major problem with this argument is that
Another flaw that weakens this argument is that.
In addition, the arguer ignores several factors that might undermine the argument.
the arguer fails to consider several other relevant factors that might influence
For instance since whats more etc.
樣本的問題:
When samples are used to make general claims about a particular group, the samples should be close enough in time to the generation they are used to support, so that historical changes will not invalidate the generalization
調(diào)查survey 的問題:
The sample of the survey conducted by the is vague.
But we are told nothing about the way the poll was conducted and how well it represented the public opinions..
How many people participated?
The sample of the survey is not representative.
數(shù)據(jù)的問題:
The study revealed, on average, only a small statistical correlation between
the data of the research is unconvincing
the sample is too small to...
the ratio of four to six
there is only figures but no proportion of the survey 還是ratio?
Insufficient Sample
If the only stand for a tiny proportion of the whole , we should not be so sure about the conclusion that
The arguer commits a fallacy of hasty generalization.
It was only carried out in Sun City, but the arguer applies its result to all the companys markets while doesnt show us whether Sun City is a representative market of the whole markets.
實(shí)驗(yàn)組的人:性別,年齡,生理特征
副作用 有的病人會(huì)對(duì)抗生素過敏
錯(cuò)誤的類比:
But the problem is that the two situations are not similar enough to justify the analogical deduction.
錯(cuò)誤的比較:
The comparison in this argument is incomplete and selective. The arguer discovers that
However, the arguer fails to provide any information regarding respectively
別的因素:
Furthermore the arguer ignores the possibility that may Unless the arguer also takes this factor into consideration, the comparison is unconvincing.
It is very likely that and hence varies significantly.
沒有因果:
Confusing causal relation with correlation
the arguer commits a fallacy of hasty generalization. Even if the maintenance of the airline has been improved as a result of sending its mechanics to the Seminar, which is, of course, an unwarranted assumption, it does not follow that 就算怎樣,也不怎樣
Finally, the arguer hints that but he fails to analyze the causes. Is it because or because ?
其他:
The fact that does not necessarily imply that
First of all, the argument is based on a hasty generalization. According to the cited studies which is understandable.
It is very likely that and hence varies significantly.
分析常用:
the actual amount of time for doing respectively
The survey is based on two isolated examples. The arguer should survey more hospitals of both types.
How large was the sample
How many people participated?
What extent do this participators improve their speed?
The arguer fails to indicate the attitude of the residents to the ABCs performance.
循環(huán)假設(shè)
The arguer commits a fallacy of begging the question in assuming that
GRE寫作如何套用模版?個(gè)人的觀點(diǎn)argument就是要用模板的~~那些承上啟下的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)表達(dá)大家都用~~不止中國人啊~~而且argument一般只看你邏輯~對(duì)于語言要求也沒那么高,整理Argument正文部分模板,希望對(duì)你的GRE備考有所借鑒
正文部分
The major problem with this argument is that
Another flaw that weakens this argument is that.
In addition, the arguer ignores several factors that might undermine the argument.
the arguer fails to consider several other relevant factors that might influence
For instance since whats more etc.
樣本的問題:
When samples are used to make general claims about a particular group, the samples should be close enough in time to the generation they are used to support, so that historical changes will not invalidate the generalization
調(diào)查survey 的問題:
The sample of the survey conducted by the is vague.
But we are told nothing about the way the poll was conducted and how well it represented the public opinions..
How many people participated?
The sample of the survey is not representative.
數(shù)據(jù)的問題:
The study revealed, on average, only a small statistical correlation between
the data of the research is unconvincing
the sample is too small to...
the ratio of four to six
there is only figures but no proportion of the survey 還是ratio?
Insufficient Sample
If the only stand for a tiny proportion of the whole , we should not be so sure about the conclusion that
The arguer commits a fallacy of hasty generalization.
It was only carried out in Sun City, but the arguer applies its result to all the companys markets while doesnt show us whether Sun City is a representative market of the whole markets.
實(shí)驗(yàn)組的人:性別,年齡,生理特征
副作用 有的病人會(huì)對(duì)抗生素過敏
錯(cuò)誤的類比:
But the problem is that the two situations are not similar enough to justify the analogical deduction.
錯(cuò)誤的比較:
The comparison in this argument is incomplete and selective. The arguer discovers that
However, the arguer fails to provide any information regarding respectively
別的因素:
Furthermore the arguer ignores the possibility that may Unless the arguer also takes this factor into consideration, the comparison is unconvincing.
It is very likely that and hence varies significantly.
沒有因果:
Confusing causal relation with correlation
the arguer commits a fallacy of hasty generalization. Even if the maintenance of the airline has been improved as a result of sending its mechanics to the Seminar, which is, of course, an unwarranted assumption, it does not follow that 就算怎樣,也不怎樣
Finally, the arguer hints that but he fails to analyze the causes. Is it because or because ?
其他:
The fact that does not necessarily imply that
First of all, the argument is based on a hasty generalization. According to the cited studies which is understandable.
It is very likely that and hence varies significantly.
分析常用:
the actual amount of time for doing respectively
The survey is based on two isolated examples. The arguer should survey more hospitals of both types.
How large was the sample
How many people participated?
What extent do this participators improve their speed?
The arguer fails to indicate the attitude of the residents to the ABCs performance.
循環(huán)假設(shè)
The arguer commits a fallacy of begging the question in assuming that