Can social media improve voter turnout?

雕龍文庫 分享 時間: 收藏本文

Can social media improve voter turnout?

We have all witnessed the power of social media. It helped elect Barack Obama president in two thousand eight. It also helped to support popular revolutions in two thousand ten and eleven that forced several long-time rulers from office.

Now, research suggests that social networks could have an even greater effect on elections, helping to increase the number of people who vote.

The new report appeared in the journal Nature. It estimates that about one third of a million more people voted in America’s two thousand ten congressional elections all because of a single message on Facebook.

James Fowler is a political science professor at the University of California, San Diego. He led the research in partnership with Facebook’s Data Science team. They studied the effect of a “get out the vote” message on more than sixty million Facebook users. The social network placed the message at the top of their Facebook news feeds on Election Day two thousand ten.

JAMES FOWLER: “And in the message, there was button that says ‘I Voted’.” There was also a link that you could click on that allowed you to look up your polling place. And in some of the messages we also showed people the pictures of their friends who had clicked on the ‘I Voted’ button earlier in the day.”

We spoke to Professor Fowler on Skype. He says the team later compared this information to publicly available voting records.

JAMES FOWLER: “And one of the remarkable things that we found was that when we were comparing the people who received these messages to the people who received no messages, the people who saw the message without the faces of their friends actually voted at exactly the same rate as the people who saw no message at all. But the people who saw faces of their friends they actually voted more.”

The researchers say the results of the study show that the message directly influenced about sixty thousand extra people to go and vote. Even more importantly, says Professor Fowler, the friends of the people who saw the message also were influenced to vote. He says this led an additional two hundred eighty thousand people to take part in the elections. As a result, the message influenced a total of three hundred forty thousand people.

And, Professor Fowler says the experiment led to an even more interesting finding. It is that in the world of social networking, like in the real world, not all friends are equal.

JAMES FOWLER: “It wasn’t all of these online connections that matter. The average person on Facebook today has about one hundred fifty friends. And when we just looked at the close friends, those closest ten people on Facebook, we found that they were driving the whole effect. That all of the extra two hundred eighty thousand voters were coming from just ten out of your one hundred fifty friends.”

The researchers say the study suggests that voting is a social behavior. They say social networking may be the best way to get more people involved in the democratic process. And they think this in not only true in politics, but in other areas as well, including public health.

And that's the VOA Special English Technology Report, written by June Simms. I'm Steve Ember.

We have all witnessed the power of social media. It helped elect Barack Obama president in two thousand eight. It also helped to support popular revolutions in two thousand ten and eleven that forced several long-time rulers from office.

Now, research suggests that social networks could have an even greater effect on elections, helping to increase the number of people who vote.

The new report appeared in the journal Nature. It estimates that about one third of a million more people voted in America’s two thousand ten congressional elections all because of a single message on Facebook.

James Fowler is a political science professor at the University of California, San Diego. He led the research in partnership with Facebook’s Data Science team. They studied the effect of a “get out the vote” message on more than sixty million Facebook users. The social network placed the message at the top of their Facebook news feeds on Election Day two thousand ten.

JAMES FOWLER: “And in the message, there was button that says ‘I Voted’.” There was also a link that you could click on that allowed you to look up your polling place. And in some of the messages we also showed people the pictures of their friends who had clicked on the ‘I Voted’ button earlier in the day.”

We spoke to Professor Fowler on Skype. He says the team later compared this information to publicly available voting records.

JAMES FOWLER: “And one of the remarkable things that we found was that when we were comparing the people who received these messages to the people who received no messages, the people who saw the message without the faces of their friends actually voted at exactly the same rate as the people who saw no message at all. But the people who saw faces of their friends they actually voted more.”

The researchers say the results of the study show that the message directly influenced about sixty thousand extra people to go and vote. Even more importantly, says Professor Fowler, the friends of the people who saw the message also were influenced to vote. He says this led an additional two hundred eighty thousand people to take part in the elections. As a result, the message influenced a total of three hundred forty thousand people.

And, Professor Fowler says the experiment led to an even more interesting finding. It is that in the world of social networking, like in the real world, not all friends are equal.

JAMES FOWLER: “It wasn’t all of these online connections that matter. The average person on Facebook today has about one hundred fifty friends. And when we just looked at the close friends, those closest ten people on Facebook, we found that they were driving the whole effect. That all of the extra two hundred eighty thousand voters were coming from just ten out of your one hundred fifty friends.”

The researchers say the study suggests that voting is a social behavior. They say social networking may be the best way to get more people involved in the democratic process. And they think this in not only true in politics, but in other areas as well, including public health.

And that's the VOA Special English Technology Report, written by June Simms. I'm Steve Ember.


主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产熟人AV一二三区| 天天在线天天综合网色| 人人澡人人透人人爽| 69av在线视频| 成年女人18级毛片毛片免费| 亚洲黄色网站视频| 国产精品久久久久鬼色| 岛国大片免费观看| 亚洲国产亚洲片在线观看播放| 色天天综合色天天碰| 在线免费观看日韩视频| 久久人人爽天天玩人人妻精品| 男女疯狂一边摸一边做羞羞视频| 国产精品vⅰdeoXXXX国产 | 国产视频你懂得| 婷婷久久香蕉五月综合| 亚洲人成日本在线观看| 精品综合久久久久久888蜜芽 | 老司机午夜精品视频在线观看免费 | 国产一卡2卡3卡四卡高清| 99在线精品视频在线观看| 日韩欧美亚洲综合一区二区| 免费a级毛片永久免费| 免费黄色网址网站| 大肉大捧一进一出好爽视频动漫| 久久精品国产99国产精2020丨| 狠狠色噜噜狠狠狠狠69| 国产免费a级片| 69精品免费视频| 快一点使劲c我在线观看| 亚洲AV无码国产精品永久一区| 真实的国产乱xxxx在线| 国产在线观a免费观看| 99精品热视频| 我要看一级黄色毛片| 亚洲xxxx18| 深夜动态福利gif动态进| 国产一区二区三区视频在线观看| **aa级毛片午夜在线播放| 巨胸喷奶水www视频网站| 久久精品日日躁夜夜躁欧美|