時(shí)代難題：我們要不要上大學(xué)?
無(wú)論是美國(guó)還是中國(guó)，考大學(xué)都是千軍萬(wàn)馬過獨(dú)木橋的一個(gè)難關(guān)。考上了大學(xué)往往還要支付高昂的學(xué)費(fèi)。決定這些的是苛刻的就業(yè)市場(chǎng)，沒有大學(xué)學(xué)位就寸步難行。觀之今日美國(guó)的大學(xué)被種種弊端所累，不再是一心向?qū)W的象牙塔，倒更像開門做生意的店家，失去了應(yīng)有教育的初衷。
It was only the other day when I asked myself the rather epistemological question: Is college really necessary?
When applying for colleges during my senior year, I thought college was simply another step in the process of life. First came elementary school , then middle school, high school, and finally college. I firmly believed college was the only option for me, and I thought it was the best decision I could make at the time.
After several eye-opening classes, professors, and stimulating discussions, I’ve realized that college may certainly be one of the biggest mistakes 18-year-olds can make.
The first of many drawbacks to modern-day college is the astronomical cost. Since 1980, American college tuition has risen about 75.7%. What’s more, the average student debt after graduation is $33,000. Is education this expensive even worth it? Putting an outrageous price tag on higher education is absurd, since it immediately deters low-income, struggling families from considering college. Even for the middle-class and upper-middle-class, paying college tuition is no easy feat . All of us college students are aware of the incredibly high price of our education, which puts many of us under unnecessary stress to do well. Additionally, these high costs have transformed college. Rather than being a haven for enlightenment, truth-seeking, and self-discovery, college is an investment.
Today, college is a transaction between the student and the school. Recently, my professor asked the entire class of about 100 people whether we feel like students or customers at our university. About three people raised their hands for feeling like a customer. However, I have no doubt that many of us, including myself, were too scared to admit the truth: students are merely customers.
By no means am I invalidating college in general. College in its most natural form is a magnificent idea. It’s a place that fosters intellectual thought, deep discussions, questioning of societal ideals and norms, and more. Today, however, fierce competition, business-minded executives, and money have contaminated the very idea of college in America.
When I mention the issue of business-minded executives, I am referring to the prominent leaders and contributors of various colleges that are more concerned with business and wealth than the genuine advancement of the institution. Take the example of Mitchell Daniels, president of Purdue University . Prior to this position, Mr. Daniels was the Governor of Indiana, the CEO of the Hudson Institute, and President of the North American Pharmaceutical Operations of Eli Lilly and Company. Does this man sound like an academic to you? Should he be trusted with managing an education institution when he’s been so involved with professions in business and politics, professions that are obsessed with gaining favor and profit?
Recently, there has also been backlash against the billionaire Koch brothers that have been donating to colleges and universities across America, and allegedly influencing the curriculum. It is said the Koch brothers donate to colleges and universities with liberal faculty and patrons in order to counteract the left-leaning biases. Through their donations, the Koch brothers are indirectly preaching pro-business civics to American college students.
This absolutely sickens me.
It is unnerving to find out that money and business have taken over colleges and universities. The fact that such vice has an influence on college curriculum tarnishes my faith in humanity.
Competition between colleges has also created an atmosphere of constant construction, artificial improvement, and rising costs. It seems like colleges and universities are enhancing their aesthetic appeal more than they are hiring more qualified professors and obtaining more resources for student learning and research. For example, Texas Tech has a lazy river, in which students simply drift atop the water in tubes. It is 645 feet long and cost a total of $8.4 million. University of California at Berkeley offers to its students a skate park, rope course, and even water sports like kayaking and sailing. Every college essentially tries to outdo the other with luxuries students do not ask for or need. These amenities do not contribute to a student’s education and are hiking up college costs unnecessarily.
An easy solution to the problems I’ve listed is to skip college entirely, to refuse to pay into the system that is poisoning the sacred action of learning. The problem is that it’s not as easy as that. Society is structured in such a way that a college isn’t an option. It’s required. There are few employers that would consider hiring an individual without at least a college degree. There’s always the option of inventing something revolutionary and starting a business, but the risk associated with such an action can often be exponentially higher than the reward.
If society hadn’t dictated college was essential for future success, I would have dropped out a long time ago. The information available on the Internet suffices for an entire college education. Furthermore, travelling and experiences like internships and fellowships can replace modern-day college education. In fact, I could argue that these experiences surpass college education in numerous ways.
Although I’ve spent a considerable amount of time and thought dissecting the issues that pervade modern-day college education, I realize the benefits of college. The networking experiences, the amazing professors, and the stimulating discussions make college worthwhile. The people I have met and the organizations I have been involved in are incredible experiences. Had I not gone to college, I’m not sure if I would have landed my summer internships and fellowships.
Therefore, I am suggesting a modification and not a transformation of college. First of all, patrons and donors of colleges must never have the ability to influence the curriculum being taught. Presidents of colleges and universities must only care about the wellbeing of the students and faculty and the preservation of education at their institution; moreover, they mustn’t be business people looking to enhance the reputation or overall wealth of their respective college.
Lastly, and most simply, we must remember what college is and why we have it. College is a place to instill critical thinking, analysis, doubt, and inspiration in the minds of our nation’s young people. College should be the home of new thought. Only after we realize the true merits of college can we begin to preserve its integrity.
Vocabulary
1. epistemological: 認(rèn)識(shí)論的。
2. elementary school: 小學(xué)。
3. stimulating: 激勵(lì)的，刺激的。
4. drawback: 缺點(diǎn);astronomical: 極大的，天文數(shù)字的。
5. tuition: 學(xué)費(fèi)。
6. outrageous: 無(wú)法容忍的，令人吃驚的;price tag: 價(jià)簽;absurd: 荒謬的;deter: 阻止;struggling: 窮苦不堪的。
7. no easy feat: 絕非輕而易舉。
8. haven: 天堂;enlightenment: 啟迪。
9. transaction: 交易。
10. by no means: 決不，并未;invalidate: 證明……錯(cuò)誤，使站不住腳。
11. magnificent: 宏大的。
12. foster: 培養(yǎng);ideal: 理想;norm: 規(guī)范。
13. fierce: 激烈的;business-minded: 商業(yè)頭腦的;contaminate: 污染，損害。
14. 當(dāng)我論及有生意頭腦的主管這個(gè)問題時(shí)，我指的是各個(gè)大學(xué)里有頭有臉的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)和捐助人，比起學(xué)校真正的進(jìn)步，他們更在乎生意和財(cái)富。prominent: 杰出的;genuine: 真正的;advancement: 進(jìn)步。
15. Purdue University: 普渡大學(xué)，美國(guó)的一所世界級(jí)名校，被譽(yù)為“美國(guó)航空航天之母”。
16. prior to: 在……之前;Governor: 州長(zhǎng);Indiana: 美國(guó)印第安納州;pharmaceutical: 制藥的。
17. 任他如此躋身于商業(yè)與政治領(lǐng)域，醉心于獲得好處和利益的行業(yè)，還能信任他去管理一個(gè)教育機(jī)構(gòu)嗎?be obsessed with: 醉心于。
18. backlash: 強(qiáng)烈反對(duì);Koch brothers: 科赫兄弟，美國(guó)石油產(chǎn)業(yè)大亨，旗下的企業(yè)集團(tuán)以石油、能源、化工產(chǎn)業(yè)為主;donate to: 捐贈(zèng);allegedly: 據(jù)說;curriculum: 課程。
19. liberal: 自由派的;faculty: 教員;patron: 資助人;counteract: 抵消;left-leaning: 左傾的; bias: 偏見。
20. preach: 灌輸，鼓吹;pro-business: 支持(自家)生意的;civics: 公民教育。
21. sicken: 使厭惡。
22. unnerving: 使人緊張不安的;take over: 掌控。
23. vice: 道德敗壞，墮落;tarnish: 玷污;humanity: 人性。
24. atmosphere: 氛圍;constant: 經(jīng)常的;artificial: 人造的。
25. 看起來(lái)，比起招攬更多合格的教授和為學(xué)生學(xué)習(xí)和研究爭(zhēng)取更多的資源，學(xué)院和大學(xué)更傾向于美化自己的吸引力。aesthetic: 美學(xué)的，審美的;qualified: 合格的。
26. Texs Tech: 得克薩斯理工大學(xué);lazy river: 懶人河，漂流河;drift: 漂流;atop: 在……上;tube: 內(nèi)胎。
27. University of California at Berkeley: 加州大學(xué)伯克利分校;kayaking: 皮劃艇。
28. outdo: 超過。
29. amenity: 設(shè)施;hike up: 上漲。
30. sacred: 神圣的。
31. 還是總有條發(fā)明革新、自起爐灶的路，但這一舉措所帶來(lái)的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)往往大于回報(bào)數(shù)倍。exponentially: 成指數(shù)地。
32. dictate: 規(guī)定，要求;drop out: 退學(xué)。
33. suffice: 足夠，使?jié)M足。
34. internship: 實(shí)習(xí)職位;fellowship: (大學(xué)的)研究員職位。
35. surpass: 超過;numerous: 數(shù)不清的。
36. considerable: 相當(dāng)大的;dissect: 仔細(xì)分析;pervade: 遍布，滲透。
37. modification: 改良。
38. 大學(xué)校長(zhǎng)必須只關(guān)心機(jī)構(gòu)中學(xué)生和教員的福利，以及教育的維護(hù);另外，他們絕不能是著眼擴(kuò)大自家名聲和總體財(cái)富的生意人。preservation: 維護(hù);respective: 各自的。
39. instill: 灌輸;critical thinking: 批判性思維。
40. merit: 價(jià)值，優(yōu)點(diǎn);integrity: 誠(chéng)信，正直。
無(wú)論是美國(guó)還是中國(guó)，考大學(xué)都是千軍萬(wàn)馬過獨(dú)木橋的一個(gè)難關(guān)。考上了大學(xué)往往還要支付高昂的學(xué)費(fèi)。決定這些的是苛刻的就業(yè)市場(chǎng)，沒有大學(xué)學(xué)位就寸步難行。觀之今日美國(guó)的大學(xué)被種種弊端所累，不再是一心向?qū)W的象牙塔，倒更像開門做生意的店家，失去了應(yīng)有教育的初衷。
It was only the other day when I asked myself the rather epistemological question: Is college really necessary?
When applying for colleges during my senior year, I thought college was simply another step in the process of life. First came elementary school , then middle school, high school, and finally college. I firmly believed college was the only option for me, and I thought it was the best decision I could make at the time.
After several eye-opening classes, professors, and stimulating discussions, I’ve realized that college may certainly be one of the biggest mistakes 18-year-olds can make.
The first of many drawbacks to modern-day college is the astronomical cost. Since 1980, American college tuition has risen about 75.7%. What’s more, the average student debt after graduation is $33,000. Is education this expensive even worth it? Putting an outrageous price tag on higher education is absurd, since it immediately deters low-income, struggling families from considering college. Even for the middle-class and upper-middle-class, paying college tuition is no easy feat . All of us college students are aware of the incredibly high price of our education, which puts many of us under unnecessary stress to do well. Additionally, these high costs have transformed college. Rather than being a haven for enlightenment, truth-seeking, and self-discovery, college is an investment.
Today, college is a transaction between the student and the school. Recently, my professor asked the entire class of about 100 people whether we feel like students or customers at our university. About three people raised their hands for feeling like a customer. However, I have no doubt that many of us, including myself, were too scared to admit the truth: students are merely customers.
By no means am I invalidating college in general. College in its most natural form is a magnificent idea. It’s a place that fosters intellectual thought, deep discussions, questioning of societal ideals and norms, and more. Today, however, fierce competition, business-minded executives, and money have contaminated the very idea of college in America.
When I mention the issue of business-minded executives, I am referring to the prominent leaders and contributors of various colleges that are more concerned with business and wealth than the genuine advancement of the institution. Take the example of Mitchell Daniels, president of Purdue University . Prior to this position, Mr. Daniels was the Governor of Indiana, the CEO of the Hudson Institute, and President of the North American Pharmaceutical Operations of Eli Lilly and Company. Does this man sound like an academic to you? Should he be trusted with managing an education institution when he’s been so involved with professions in business and politics, professions that are obsessed with gaining favor and profit?
Recently, there has also been backlash against the billionaire Koch brothers that have been donating to colleges and universities across America, and allegedly influencing the curriculum. It is said the Koch brothers donate to colleges and universities with liberal faculty and patrons in order to counteract the left-leaning biases. Through their donations, the Koch brothers are indirectly preaching pro-business civics to American college students.
This absolutely sickens me.
It is unnerving to find out that money and business have taken over colleges and universities. The fact that such vice has an influence on college curriculum tarnishes my faith in humanity.
Competition between colleges has also created an atmosphere of constant construction, artificial improvement, and rising costs. It seems like colleges and universities are enhancing their aesthetic appeal more than they are hiring more qualified professors and obtaining more resources for student learning and research. For example, Texas Tech has a lazy river, in which students simply drift atop the water in tubes. It is 645 feet long and cost a total of $8.4 million. University of California at Berkeley offers to its students a skate park, rope course, and even water sports like kayaking and sailing. Every college essentially tries to outdo the other with luxuries students do not ask for or need. These amenities do not contribute to a student’s education and are hiking up college costs unnecessarily.
An easy solution to the problems I’ve listed is to skip college entirely, to refuse to pay into the system that is poisoning the sacred action of learning. The problem is that it’s not as easy as that. Society is structured in such a way that a college isn’t an option. It’s required. There are few employers that would consider hiring an individual without at least a college degree. There’s always the option of inventing something revolutionary and starting a business, but the risk associated with such an action can often be exponentially higher than the reward.
If society hadn’t dictated college was essential for future success, I would have dropped out a long time ago. The information available on the Internet suffices for an entire college education. Furthermore, travelling and experiences like internships and fellowships can replace modern-day college education. In fact, I could argue that these experiences surpass college education in numerous ways.
Although I’ve spent a considerable amount of time and thought dissecting the issues that pervade modern-day college education, I realize the benefits of college. The networking experiences, the amazing professors, and the stimulating discussions make college worthwhile. The people I have met and the organizations I have been involved in are incredible experiences. Had I not gone to college, I’m not sure if I would have landed my summer internships and fellowships.
Therefore, I am suggesting a modification and not a transformation of college. First of all, patrons and donors of colleges must never have the ability to influence the curriculum being taught. Presidents of colleges and universities must only care about the wellbeing of the students and faculty and the preservation of education at their institution; moreover, they mustn’t be business people looking to enhance the reputation or overall wealth of their respective college.
Lastly, and most simply, we must remember what college is and why we have it. College is a place to instill critical thinking, analysis, doubt, and inspiration in the minds of our nation’s young people. College should be the home of new thought. Only after we realize the true merits of college can we begin to preserve its integrity.
Vocabulary
1. epistemological: 認(rèn)識(shí)論的。
2. elementary school: 小學(xué)。
3. stimulating: 激勵(lì)的，刺激的。
4. drawback: 缺點(diǎn);astronomical: 極大的，天文數(shù)字的。
5. tuition: 學(xué)費(fèi)。
6. outrageous: 無(wú)法容忍的，令人吃驚的;price tag: 價(jià)簽;absurd: 荒謬的;deter: 阻止;struggling: 窮苦不堪的。
7. no easy feat: 絕非輕而易舉。
8. haven: 天堂;enlightenment: 啟迪。
9. transaction: 交易。
10. by no means: 決不，并未;invalidate: 證明……錯(cuò)誤，使站不住腳。
11. magnificent: 宏大的。
12. foster: 培養(yǎng);ideal: 理想;norm: 規(guī)范。
13. fierce: 激烈的;business-minded: 商業(yè)頭腦的;contaminate: 污染，損害。
14. 當(dāng)我論及有生意頭腦的主管這個(gè)問題時(shí)，我指的是各個(gè)大學(xué)里有頭有臉的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)和捐助人，比起學(xué)校真正的進(jìn)步，他們更在乎生意和財(cái)富。prominent: 杰出的;genuine: 真正的;advancement: 進(jìn)步。
15. Purdue University: 普渡大學(xué)，美國(guó)的一所世界級(jí)名校，被譽(yù)為“美國(guó)航空航天之母”。
16. prior to: 在……之前;Governor: 州長(zhǎng);Indiana: 美國(guó)印第安納州;pharmaceutical: 制藥的。
17. 任他如此躋身于商業(yè)與政治領(lǐng)域，醉心于獲得好處和利益的行業(yè)，還能信任他去管理一個(gè)教育機(jī)構(gòu)嗎?be obsessed with: 醉心于。
18. backlash: 強(qiáng)烈反對(duì);Koch brothers: 科赫兄弟，美國(guó)石油產(chǎn)業(yè)大亨，旗下的企業(yè)集團(tuán)以石油、能源、化工產(chǎn)業(yè)為主;donate to: 捐贈(zèng);allegedly: 據(jù)說;curriculum: 課程。
19. liberal: 自由派的;faculty: 教員;patron: 資助人;counteract: 抵消;left-leaning: 左傾的; bias: 偏見。
20. preach: 灌輸，鼓吹;pro-business: 支持(自家)生意的;civics: 公民教育。
21. sicken: 使厭惡。
22. unnerving: 使人緊張不安的;take over: 掌控。
23. vice: 道德敗壞，墮落;tarnish: 玷污;humanity: 人性。
24. atmosphere: 氛圍;constant: 經(jīng)常的;artificial: 人造的。
25. 看起來(lái)，比起招攬更多合格的教授和為學(xué)生學(xué)習(xí)和研究爭(zhēng)取更多的資源，學(xué)院和大學(xué)更傾向于美化自己的吸引力。aesthetic: 美學(xué)的，審美的;qualified: 合格的。
26. Texs Tech: 得克薩斯理工大學(xué);lazy river: 懶人河，漂流河;drift: 漂流;atop: 在……上;tube: 內(nèi)胎。
27. University of California at Berkeley: 加州大學(xué)伯克利分校;kayaking: 皮劃艇。
28. outdo: 超過。
29. amenity: 設(shè)施;hike up: 上漲。
30. sacred: 神圣的。
31. 還是總有條發(fā)明革新、自起爐灶的路，但這一舉措所帶來(lái)的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)往往大于回報(bào)數(shù)倍。exponentially: 成指數(shù)地。
32. dictate: 規(guī)定，要求;drop out: 退學(xué)。
33. suffice: 足夠，使?jié)M足。
34. internship: 實(shí)習(xí)職位;fellowship: (大學(xué)的)研究員職位。
35. surpass: 超過;numerous: 數(shù)不清的。
36. considerable: 相當(dāng)大的;dissect: 仔細(xì)分析;pervade: 遍布，滲透。
37. modification: 改良。
38. 大學(xué)校長(zhǎng)必須只關(guān)心機(jī)構(gòu)中學(xué)生和教員的福利，以及教育的維護(hù);另外，他們絕不能是著眼擴(kuò)大自家名聲和總體財(cái)富的生意人。preservation: 維護(hù);respective: 各自的。
39. instill: 灌輸;critical thinking: 批判性思維。
40. merit: 價(jià)值，優(yōu)點(diǎn);integrity: 誠(chéng)信，正直。
